Is it .08 or more when I drive or .08 or more at the time
I'm tested, or both, that will make me guilty of DWI?
Our law only
provides that the crime of DWI occurs when a person drives, and
at that time, has an alcohol concentration of .08 or more in
his body. It is not a per se crime to have an alcohol
concentration of .08 in the body either before or after one has
driven. However, depending on the time the test is conducted,
such an alcohol concentration may be relevant in
determining if the person had a .08 or more alcohol
concentration when the actual driving occurred.
The timing
of the particular test in question presents a significant
problem for both the prosecution and the defense. This dilemma
arises because .08 alcohol concentration testing is hardly ever
done at or immediately after driving. Rather, an alcohol
concentration test is usually administered approximately 45
minutes to 1 hour and 15 minutes after driving. In such
delayed testing, absent other information about the number of
alcoholic drinks consumed, the type of drinks consumed, and
knowledge of when the drinks were consumed, it is scientifically
impossible to determine if the person was over, or more
importantly for the innocent, under a .08 alcohol concentration at
the time of driving.
For example,
let's change our earlier scenario somewhat by having the person
finish his fourth cocktail at 11:55 p.m. He leaves the smoke
filled restaurant at 12:00 a.m. for a 5 minute drive home.
However, this time instead of being stopped for speeding, he is
stopped at 12:01 a.m. because the light over his license tag has
burned out. The officer, having observed a fresh (strong) odor
of an alcoholic beverage on the driver's breath and his smoke
reddened eyes, arrests him for DWI. The officer then transports
him to the station house for an alcohol concentration test. The
test is given at 12:30 and its result is .08. Here, depending on
the timing of the person's earlier consumption of alcoholic
drinks, it is equally possible that earlier at 12:01
a.m., the person's alcohol concentration was .05, i.e., not
guilty, or .15, i.e., guilty. In the final analysis on this
point, it may not have been a smart thing for our person to have
driven at all, but if he was the .05, he neither committed nor
would have committed a DWI offense.